From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 4 11: 1:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from imladris.rielhome.conectiva (brutus.conectiva.com.br [200.250.58.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2BD37B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:01:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from riel@conectiva.com.br) Received: from localhost (IDENT:riel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imladris.rielhome.conectiva (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f24IvMK04272; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:58:23 -0300 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:57:22 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-Sender: riel@imladris.rielhome.conectiva To: Jordan DeLong Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD pthreads In-Reply-To: <20010304111150.A10676@cx420564-b.tucson1.az.home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Jordan DeLong wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:08:51AM +0000, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > clone() wont count against the per uid process limit, right? > actually I just realized it'd be incredibly stupid for clone not to > count against the per uid process limit It does the exact same check a normal fork() would do, in fact it shares the same code path ;) Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message