From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 04:10:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B85216A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:10:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6A543D5C for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC46C72DE5; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E708F72DE4; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:10:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Matt Meola In-Reply-To: <1114091250.29964.2.camel@matt.den-esniff.com> Message-ID: <20050425210955.A43358@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <1113495921.966.21.camel@matt.den-esniff.com> <1114091250.29964.2.camel@matt.den-esniff.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4 RC2 on a Compaq Laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:10:18 -0000 On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Matt Meola wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 19:25 -0700, Doug White wrote: > > See the freebsd-amd64 list archives for an extensive discussion on the > > R3000 series. (or was it -mobile? :-) ) > > Yeah, I saw all that, and the gnats bug about it, too. It appears that > what needed to change was changed, and committed to (at least) -CURRENT. > > > You will probably need to run at least -STABLE. These machines are wierd > > birds. > > :-) You're telling me... BTW, I was under the impression that 5.4-RC* > was actually released from the -STABLE branch... Am I mistaken on that? That is correct. But I was trying to say I don't think 5.3-R will work. :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org