From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 19 5:34:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.databits.net [207.29.192.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33EAA37B417 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 05:34:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 82042 invoked by uid 1001); 19 Nov 2001 13:34:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:34:17 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman To: Jeremy Norris Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: $FreeBSD$ in pkg-plist (was Re: ports/32037: New port: pm-lib) Message-ID: <20011119083417.C81774@databits.net> References: <200111190520.fAJ5K2t67168@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200111190520.fAJ5K2t67168@freefall.freebsd.org>; from ishmael27@home.com on Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:20:02PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ++ 18/11/01 21:20 -0800 - Jeremy Norris: | Please use this shar instead of original (adds $FreeBSD$ to pkg-plist). Is this really necessary? It isn't documented anywhere and portlint doesn't check for it. Most ports do not have this, while just a few do. Personally, I don't see any need for it. A few people I have talked to tend to agree with me, too. So can we come up with a policy about this and be consistent? -pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message