Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:26:43 +0800 From: Charon <charon@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Success Stories Message-ID: <20040403172643.GA48831@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <1080972666.77366.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil> References: <20040401220702.B56A86A832@smtp4.pacifier.net> <1080972666.77366.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:11:06AM -0500, Chris Laverdure wrote: > I really question those crazy high uptimes. They may reflect a carefull configuration choice to begin with. Also, consider the anti bsd sentiments of some Linux folk and the perception that old=unpatched and therefore unsecure. The uptimes might really be valid. The only way to be sure is to ask the admins of the site.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040403172643.GA48831>