From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 10 20:50:32 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B911065695
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:50:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com
	[209.85.220.218])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F204E8FC0C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so7255297fxm.14
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:50:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=pTDPfN1G9GnDz/0WT3aThqLa0q+HuvD0a6IIS5mo2Ms=;
	b=LL+SqCXulLuwaLTD0YEqfsi4JUWN+rLINvKQVklDj9i5cC7PoGOzEMlo83Pd3d00aP
	JgW9LQPp86vn9uvUXAUdfQDIwUOel2IGPwgTU4ejwM02wVxihW9bqV0tHxjx58BxXoAp
	wkNzR0xrVHme+dd5o31nAKmWY45mqBxHsxuV0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
	:from:to:content-type;
	b=ntB0M0l1W68etrvu3e9AMZISTAiIvCUy8PSCowEYsL48Em5uI9ni7dEgpBnWcfX6/B
	DfaPwCCdzanmoiXX2nJRxEdV8sx3uYKRw1A2liAd1RsAQjlWfnEZLHLkOIV36HGPF4kZ
	WmPgXsMuaNdC7Os1TQQXpcIhpOI/WOA3CT+Aw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.183.209 with SMTP id v17mr1374445hbg.209.1263154845216; 
	Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:20:45 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3cca8932dea3c82f
Message-ID: <f19c444a1001101220x57fcb25p26935b6b085e35db@mail.gmail.com>
From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: MK_NETGRAPH and MK_ATM/MK_BLUETOOTH
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:50:32 -0000

Hi there,

I am looking at PR 137487, world broken WITHOUT_NETGRAPH.
Is it reasonable to have MK_NETGRAPH=no enforce MK_ATM=no and MK_BLUETOOTH=no?
The bluetooth stack is implemented using the netgraph framework.  Some
bluetooth userland tools include netgraph headers or use netgraph
sockets.
There are 2 ATM stacks, netnatm and netgraph/atm.
netgraph/atm obviously uses netgraph.
For netnatm, this is not clear if there is a dependency: atmconfig(8)
includes netgraph headers and some files in sys/contrib/ngatm/netnatm
also include netgraph headers.

Thanks in advance,

Cheers,

Antoine