From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 06:35:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA3A16A401; Tue, 8 May 2007 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CAF13C448; Tue, 8 May 2007 06:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l486X4Yi036746; Tue, 8 May 2007 00:33:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 00:33:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20070508.003307.-278387340.imp@bsdimp.com> To: deischen@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20070506175150.L11224@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 08 May 2007 00:33:05 -0600 (MDT) Cc: bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: shared library bump, symbol versioning, libthr change X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 06:35:39 -0000 In message: Daniel Eischen writes: : On Sun, 6 May 2007, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: : : > On Sun, 6 May 2007, Daniel Eischen wrote: : > : > Hi, : > : > thanks a lot for all the work! : > : >> by bumping shared library versions. You can disable : >> symbol versioning by setting NO_SYMVER. : > : > I wonder if we should plug this in into the WITH/WITHOUT_* framework : > of HEAD instead of adding new NO_* variables? : : I don't care one way or the other... in -current this is done WITH_FOO or WITHOUT_FOO, but in the makefile it is MK_FOO = "yes" or "no" Warner