Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:12:09 +0600
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@cytherea.weblab.nsu.ru>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports INDEX
Message-ID:  <20020311141209.D54340@cytherea.weblab.nsu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20020311000045.A9060@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:00:45AM -0800
References:  <200203100157.g2A1vFm21964@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020310205909.GA623@mitya.mitya.static.dol.ru> <20020310181007.A2332@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020311135728.B54340@cytherea.weblab.nsu.ru> <20020311000045.A9060@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:00:45AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:57:28PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> 
> > I tend to agree, X-3 is actually pretty obsolete right now, and X-4 is
> > feature-rich and stable.  Then again, how about bumping 4.1.0 up to
> > 4.2.0 ??
> 
> How about not repeating the same threads we've had dozens of times
> before (both of them)?

Well, *I* have not been "dozens of times" on this (what?) thread, and I had
not seen any thread at all.  I pretty much think that I've missed it, but I
don't see how it distolerates my opinion.  As for on-topic discussion, I
still don't see why we must have 4.1.0 in ports (at least).

./danfe

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311141209.D54340>