From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 11:33:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B82BFD; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.feld.me", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B00B19E4; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.6]); by mail.feld.me (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0d2ce97c; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 06:33:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from feld@feld.me by mail.feld.me (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1397043207-22169-6041/5/1; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:33:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: svn commit: r349818 - head/www/nginx From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: <20140409060926.GA94220@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 06:33:24 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201404010040.s310e5en074822@svn.freebsd.org> <5342F077.8000105@freebsd.org> <20140409060926.GA94220@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Sender: feld@feld.me Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Niclas Zeising X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:33:33 -0000 On Apr 9, 2014, at 1:09, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>=20 >> - Update made to www/nginx that should require a PORTREVISION bump >> - Couldn't bump PORTREVISION and remove PORTEPOCH >=20 > Could you explain what exactly do you mean by "couldn't bump PORTREVISI= ON"? > What prevented it from getting bumped? I recall now I had bumped PORTREVISION and removed PORTEPOCH which did = not work because the version technically went backwards. When I tried to = have both PORTERVISION and PORTEPOCH I was getting FATAL errors with = portlint. I wonder if it was an issue with the order? I thought I tested = both ways, but perhaps I'm mistaken. Testing right now shows that it = should have worked, so I'm not sure why I came to the conclusion that = the only option was to bump PORTEPOCH.