From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 18:28:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F1528F; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com (exprod7og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960D68FC08; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUIrWKp/DrTvR1kSPUx+MitvqFVepq15O@postini.com; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:28:02 PDT Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:26:37 -0700 Received: from chaos.jnpr.net (chaos.jnpr.net [172.24.29.229]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id q9QIQbh43997; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:26:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from chaos.jnpr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.jnpr.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5378058094; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:26:37 -0700 (PDT) To: , Marcel Moolenaar , Garrett Cooper , , Subject: Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program In-Reply-To: <20121026175559.GA44331@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201210020750.23358.jhb@freebsd.org> <201210021037.27762.jhb@freebsd.org> <127FA63D-8EEE-4616-AE1E-C39469DDCC6A@xcllnt.net> <20121025211522.GA32636@dragon.NUXI.org> <3F52B7C9-A7B7-4E0E-87D0-1E67FE5D0BA7@xcllnt.net> <20121026175559.GA44331@dragon.NUXI.org> Comments: In-reply-to: "David O'Brien" message dated "Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:55:59 -0700." From: "Simon J. Gerraty" X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82+cvs; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:26:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20121026182637.5378058094@chaos.jnpr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:28:02 -0000 On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:55:59 -0700, "David O'Brien" writes: >I'm trying to create an ATF test for filemon, but I don't want to have to >build make back and forth when I want to build a port. >Likely that doesn't put me in the "people working on ATF" in your book. >What can I and others do to work on this? I'm not on Portmgr and most >aren't either. Why not simply install bmake as bmake? You can even use devel/bmake in ports. >I disagree. Before sending my mail, I ran this by sjg and his response >was: "I have absolutely no objection". I have no objection to bmake being installed as bmake.