Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:54:09 +0100 From: Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Best way for an app to accept traffic on 30,000+ interfaces? Message-ID: <96327F03-86EC-4EE6-9679-F66A960BDDB4@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG2eZ3C68HaAPRUehBJ62L%2B87-LdLRrMRkzj=-09dHKrYA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130321005959.98706.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net> <CAPBZQG2eZ3C68HaAPRUehBJ62L%2B87-LdLRrMRkzj=-09dHKrYA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 21, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Ermal Luçi <eri@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Mark D <markd-freebsd-net@bushwire.net>wrote: > >> (Hopefully this isn't too out-of-scope for this list..) >> >> I have an application in mind that I'd like to have accept/respond to >> UDP queries sent to perhaps 30K contiguous IP addresses (most likely >> IPV6 addresses because such ranges are easy to come by, but >> conceptually ipv4 as well). >> >> This would all be on a small number of FBSD instances. >> >> Though it could be done, I don't really want to create 30K interfaces >> and have the application bind 30K sockets as it's not clear if that >> will scale if I try an address range that expands to, say, 1M IPs >> wide. >> >> This address range would be internet-facing and responding to random >> remote clients. >> >> My first thought is to use SOCK_RAW in much the same way that natd >> does - at least to receive the traffic. >> >> Is that a sensible and viable approach or is there a better/easier >> way? >> >> >> Mark. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > How about firing up one of the firewall/pfil(9) consumers like (ipfw/pf) > and adding rules to redirect traffic to a socket bound on loopback? > > -- > Ermal I fail to see how that's different from what I suggested with PF's rdr rule ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96327F03-86EC-4EE6-9679-F66A960BDDB4>