From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 23 8:22:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EA237B401 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MX4.estpak.ee (ld1.estpak.ee [194.126.101.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5DB43E42 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from tiiu.internal (80-235-38-139-dsl.lsn.estpak.ee [80.235.38.139]) by MX4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE3C1D0009; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:22:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: from tiiu.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiiu.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8NFMfBK002975; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:22:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vallo@tiiu.internal) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by tiiu.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8NFMdba002974; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:22:39 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:22:39 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Alexander Kabaev Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, daver@gomerbud.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: trouble building XFree86-4-Server under yesterday's current Message-ID: <20020923152239.GB2812@tiiu.internal> Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee References: <20020923105518.GB1863@tiiu.internal> <20020923163051.V1756-100000@hades> <20020923145425.GA2812@tiiu.internal> <20020923110813.5ffe1702.ak03@gte.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020923110813.5ffe1702.ak03@gte.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:08:13AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > Heh, this sounds like a joke.. because I have written at least three > > messages to -current list about the very same thing. I know that > > following -current list for day-to-day basis is challenge, but > > nevertheless this surprises me. Seems like nobody has read my > > messages nor find the cause of this failure interesting. Yes this > > caused bu machine type optimisation and everybody who's brave enough > > to set CPUTYPE=p[234] will be trapped. > > You might want to report the bug to GCC developers first instead of > sending your complaints here. Some help finding the offending function > and providing people with additional information will come a long way > toward having this bug finally fixed. Please consult > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions if you decide to do so. I'm not complaining, only reporting what I found. It's quite unfair for non-developer to complain about development track, IMHO. I'll see what I can do, but finding offending function is probably beyond my knowledge. -- Vallo Kallaste kalts@estpak.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message