Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:03:09 +1100
From:      Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
To:        youshi10@u.washington.edu
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg_upgrade (was Re: pkg_add does not backtrack, does it?)
Message-ID:  <20070209200309.GH834@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0702090943010.5825@hymn01.u.washington.edu>
References:  <17868.40406.608011.589753@bhuda.mired.org> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0702090943010.5825@hymn01.u.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
>>Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
>>the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
>>it were written in a language in the base system.
>
>Would perl be close enough to count, or would it have to be C/C++?

Perl was removed in 5.x.  Your options are shell, awk and C/C++.

--=20
Peter Jeremy

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFzNN9/opHv/APuIcRAoD9AKDC2rcqqB8gXAW0UHfYebNpiz+lMQCgwBMz
YAiTUUo37bL8k5uVciyvxcQ=
=XjB2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070209200309.GH834>