From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 5 02:16:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9537216A400 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 02:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3AF43D45 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 02:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [192.168.42.21] (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k452GEPI066920 for ; Thu, 4 May 2006 21:16:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <445AB56F.8090907@centtech.com> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 21:16:15 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060402) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1444/Thu May 4 16:21:06 2006 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Core Duo - only one cpu being used X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 02:16:16 -0000 Forgive me if I've missed this on a list somewhere, but My new laptop with a Core Duo doesn't seem to use both CPU's. It sees both, but I never see anything on cpu 1. Here's a top snippet: last pid: 20852; load averages: 1.31, 1.27, 1.00 up 0+01:20:55 21:05:47 100 processes: 2 running, 98 sleeping CPU states: 47.4% user, 0.0% nice, 1.3% system, 1.3% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 383M Active, 391M Inact, 154M Wired, 34M Cache, 110M Buf, 25M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 20851 root 1 127 0 23024K 22400K RUN 0 0:03 88.66% cc1plus 861 anderson 1 96 0 108M 85384K select 0 1:22 0.98% Xorg 958 anderson 5 20 0 109M 97228K kserel 0 2:14 0.00% firefox-bin 922 anderson 1 96 0 19556K 14944K select 0 0:54 0.00% xfce4-panel 592 root 1 8 0 1348K 872K nanslp 0 0:43 0.00% powerd 932 anderson 6 20 0 75360K 60860K kserel 0 0:20 0.00% thunderbird-bin 28378 root 1 8 0 31388K 30920K wait 0 0:17 0.00% ruby18 909 anderson 1 96 0 29416K 15816K select 0 0:12 0.00% kdeinit 920 anderson 1 96 0 16412K 11228K select 0 0:03 0.00% xfdesktop 559 root 1 96 0 1448K 872K select 0 0:02 0.00% bthidd All processes are on cpu 0. Output of sysctl dev.cpu shows: dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU0 dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0 dev.cpu.0.freq: 2005 dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2005/-1 1754/-1 1503/-1 1253/-1 1002/-1 751/-1 501/-1 250/-1 dev.cpu.1.%desc: ACPI CPU dev.cpu.1.%driver: cpu dev.cpu.1.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU1 dev.cpu.1.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 dev.cpu.1.%parent: acpi0 More information (dmesg, sysctl -a, devinfo, pciconf, etc) can be found here: http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/200605041945/ Thanks.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------