From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 21:03:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B91498E2CE for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:61e8::2525:2525]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E8C1EBA for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from gjp by mail.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBr46-000LPq-3e; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 22:03:06 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 22:03:06 +0100 From: Gary Palmer To: Quartz Cc: FreeBSD FS Subject: Re: A question about ZFS built-in SMB Message-ID: <20150705210306.GA1048@in-addr.com> References: <5599496C.6010702@sneakertech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5599496C.6010702@sneakertech.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 21:03:09 -0000 On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 11:12:44AM -0400, Quartz wrote: > Assuming the following: > > - A server running FreeBSD 10.1 > > - A ZFS pool with no restrictions on how it can be set up > > - Clients running Windows XP/Vista/7/8 > > - The need for a "public share" with two main directories, which we'll > call 'stuff' and 'dropbox'. Anonymous guest users have read/write access > to 'dropbox', and read-only access to 'stuff' as well as being > restricted in which files and directories they can even see there. > Admin-class users have full permissions and visibility to both directories. > > > > Is installing Samba still a requirement, or is ZFS's built-in SMB > sharing complete and robust enough now to be able to handle everything > natively? (Alternatively, is SMB itself even still a requirement or are > there other options these days (that don't require installing software > or custom configs on the clients))? The sharesmb option to zfs does not work on FreeBSD. You need to use Samba. >From "man zfs": sharesmb=on | off | opts The sharesmb property currently has no effect on FreeBSD. As far as I am aware, without 3rd party software, Windows only supports SMB/CIFS. Note: I try to keep as far away from Windows as possible, so that may be wrong. Regards, Gary