From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 30 13:18:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226B937B401 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:18:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F187243FAF for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:18:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lamont@scriptkiddie.org) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEEB62D1A; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:18:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:18:44 -0800 (PST) From: Lamont Granquist To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: David Gilbert , Subject: Re: Network block device. In-Reply-To: <20030129180043.S8642@sasami.jurai.net> Message-ID: <20030130131600.Q823-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > What you really want is SCSI over IP. Anything else is just a hack and > not to be trusted. And iSCSI isn't? > I think that NFS is less of a hack than NBD though. > Of course if Linux still suffers from poor NFS performance that might > explain why they came up with NBD in the first place. And Linux still suffers from poor NFS stability. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message