From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Feb 14 16:46:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from kinkajou.arc.nasa.gov (kinkajou.arc.nasa.gov [128.102.132.150]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D6A4E71 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:32:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (lamaster@localhost) by kinkajou.arc.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA19671 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:32:28 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: kinkajou.arc.nasa.gov: lamaster owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:32:28 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh LaMaster X-Sender: lamaster@kinkajou.arc.nasa.gov To: SCSI FreeBSD Subject: Re: SC200/ncr53c810 problems In-Reply-To: <200002100100.CAA00993@oranje.my.domain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Marc van Woerkom wrote: > Now I believe the SC200 card sucks for some unknown reason. I've used an early SC200 for years; haven't seen any problem on a system that was pre-CAM (was 3.0-current as of last March or so?), hasn't been updated since. I'm hoping that it will still work fine when I go to 3.4-STABLE ... Anyway, it isn't a bad card, although it doesn't have IRQ flexibility. (That reminds me: can any/all FreeBSD PCI drivers share IRQ's? I'm running out (SCSI controller, EIDE, Audio, Video card, ... ) If so, any pointers to documentation? -- Hugh LaMaster, M/S 233-21, Email: lamaster@nren.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Or: lamaster@nas.nasa.gov Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 Or: lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov Phone: 650/604-1056 Disc: Unofficial, personal *opinion*. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message