From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 17:17:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F99516A4CF; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:17:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6442443FD7; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:17:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9V1H0JC031571; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:17:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9V1H0s7031570; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:17:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:16:59 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20031031011659.GA31439@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , John Baldwin , arch@FreeBSD.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: New i386 interrupt and SMP code.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: arch@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 01:17:02 -0000 On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:34:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > Downsides: > - ACPI will no longer work as a module for know. The reason > for this is that ACPI's APIC enumerator needs to be able > to hook into a SI_SUB_TUNABLES - 1 SYSINIT() due to existing > code that wants to know the available CPUs in the system > very early (specifically, UMA). How will one not have to deal with fscked-up AML BIOS code, when one wants to use MADT rather than mptable's to use the APIC? I.E., the ACPI-AML bits should be seperatable from the ACPI-MADT bits.