From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Feb  4 08:37:00 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA11621
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 08:37:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from socrates.i-pi.com (socrates.i-pi.com [198.49.217.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA11611
          for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 08:36:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from ingham@socrates.i-pi.com)
Received: (from ingham@localhost)
	by socrates.i-pi.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA03008;
	Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:35:47 -0700
Message-ID: <19990204093547.A3001@socrates.i-pi.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:35:47 -0700
From: Kenneth Ingham <ingham@i-pi.com>
To: "Christopher G. Petrilli" <petrilli@amber.org>,
        Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Enabling bpf device in kernel (was: Re: tcpdump)
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990204095555.10265F-100000@www.babel.dk> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902040505560.66070-100000@nomad.dataplex.net> <19990204102322.28863@amber.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2
In-Reply-To: <19990204102322.28863@amber.org>; from Christopher G. Petrilli on Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 10:23:22AM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Ick, I've never had anything but sickness with DHCP on Unices...
I've run several with DHCP (including FreeBSD, Linux, and IRIX) and they
all run fine.

The idea of a question at install time to decide whether to use DHCP or
a statis IP addr sounds good to me, as does making ISC DCHP part of the
normal distribution (it's what I always use as a UNIX client).

Kenneth

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message