From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 12:09:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006FA106566C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4F38FC15 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP29 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:09:55 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP29.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:09:53 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Vlm400Z57z2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 08:09:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 08:09:51 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2012 12:09:53.0268 (UTC) FILETIME=[24DA6340:01CD2B81] Subject: Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 12:09:56 -0000 On Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block articulated: >On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: > >>> All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, >>> assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. >> >> The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's >> the rc system refusing to start a duplicate dhclient process on some >> interface. As your network interface is via a PCI device, I can't >> see why devd would think it should try and restart dhclient for it. > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165477 may be relevant. >It's on 9-stable, I haven't compared with 8.3. Warren, I posted an addendum to that PR to indicate that the behavior is also occurring on "8.3" systems as well. Do you think it would be prudent to open a new PR with my info since it concerns FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE and not the "9.0" branch? I was also wondering if anyone other than myself is seeing this phenomenon on the "8.3" version. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com