From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Thu Jul  6 13:46:46 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F02DAE075
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  6 Jul 2017 13:46:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A206FE63
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jul 2017 13:46:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v66DkYZf090557
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Thu, 6 Jul 2017 07:46:34 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v66DkYxk090554;
 Thu, 6 Jul 2017 07:46:34 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 07:46:34 -0600 (MDT)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD did it again (still)
In-Reply-To: <3cbeca30-8801-d800-edcb-f64ea2f079e0@columbus.rr.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1707060743420.80012@wonkity.com>
References: <27b3c757-1f00-a033-03f6-303a82ab65f2@columbus.rr.com>
 <3ce31ee2-5e35-d31c-71ca-dc95ece2dd61@intersonic.se>
 <020431a6-1a7d-d80e-0725-585c21f3ef27@columbus.rr.com>
 <563b14d5-ebfb-62b6-28ac-3ebbd663d067@intersonic.se>
 <e2cab146-89c9-23b0-e6ac-6222d8747277@columbus.rr.com>
 <8c1bb853-5eb0-4fae-ee26-5ff4684c2b3a@saunalahti.fi>
 <1499345128.3276.2.camel@gmail.com>
 <3cbeca30-8801-d800-edcb-f64ea2f079e0@columbus.rr.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSF 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 06 Jul 2017 07:46:34 -0600 (MDT)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 13:46:46 -0000

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Baho Utot wrote:

> Well FYI the upgrade base 10.1 to 11.0-p10 when as expected. Update the ports 
> to the current quarterly was a tragic happening.  I have done this before 
> upgrade a desktop from 10.3 to 11.0-p0 then to 11.0-p9.  Again the ports just 
> did not work as it resulted in a broken desktop each time.  I started using 
> the quarterly ports branch thinking I get some stablilty.  No stability to be 
> found.  Should I user be able to update without going thru a weeks worth of 
> debugging?  I think that is not too much to ask.

It might or might not be obvious, but after going from FreeBSD 10 to 11 
all ports must be reinstalled.  It is not possible to upgrade only some 
ports without mysterious breakages.