From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:08:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B43C1065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB67B8FC1E for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so1253637iyb.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3x/ma85+vKge9uyopz/DKg7q1NCoRrD12+bdc7T5TSI=; b=Wt4RkEdkXMVJT+UthavHnCjfNaCR72tmBOYLl2k1HJgKjCVQtxnKh0wa8o4XsvtgQh y8ka/W+5rOVycB8D7DCEIgVDph1AbnwA4qd8m7/OY3Q7wTHWYDtoAsq97piM0tERTfEL NQyHKUkgFBVyPZBGWIK6BLsFl93LEnZaPB8a8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.0.234 with SMTP id 42mr6018986ibc.110.1311710893042; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> References: <20110726204737.534ab5f5@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:08:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Bob Eager Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which to bump for distfile location change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:08:14 -0000 On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote: > > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to > change a distfile location. > > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to > change (if any). > No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. Chris