Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:56:05 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, chris@sigd.net Subject: Re: UFS2 with SAN Message-ID: <45D0FE95.30600@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <86ire7gdnv.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAAE@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <45CD6AA6.1000003@freebsd.org> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAB0@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <45CD6FF5.8070007@freebsd.org> <86ire7gdnv.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org> writes: >> Well, I'm not sure what issues they had, but have had fantastic >> success with NFS and FreeBSD. FreeBSD with the right hardware and >> tweaks can make some NetApp boxes look weak. *cough* WAFL *cough* > > I'd be very surprised, considering that NetApp filers run FreeBSD. not 100 % true.. Until 6 months ago they were based on a proprietary kernel with NetBSD networking code grafted into it. Their newest stuff is based on FreeBSD, but any older model stuff they sell is still the old OS. > > DES
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45D0FE95.30600>