From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 01:21:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3898CA5 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219118FC12 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBD1Lo1W002261; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:21:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBD1LnUD002258; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:21:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:21:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Zaphod Beeblebrox Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:21:50 +0100 (CET) Cc: FreeBSD Hackers X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:21:54 -0000 > common to move from area to area in the game loading, unloading and > reloading the same data. My test is a valid comparison of the two > modes of loading the game ... from iSCSI and from SMB. i don't know how windows cache network shares (iSCSI is treated as local not network). Here is a main problem IMHO.