From owner-freebsd-fs  Mon Sep 23 07:28:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-fs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA17295
          for fs-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 07:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA17260;
          Mon, 23 Sep 1996 07:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id JAA11836; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 09:24:46 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199609231424.JAA11836@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: vnode_pager_uncache()
To: dfr@render.com (Doug Rabson)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 09:24:46 -0500 (EST)
Cc: fs@freebsd.org, lite2@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.960923144508.11343N-100000@minnow.render.com> from "Doug Rabson" at Sep 23, 96 02:51:49 pm
Reply-To: dyson@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-fs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I want to add a struct proc* argument to this call.  The reason is that
> lite2 has a struct proc* argument to vn_lock/VOP_UNLOCK and panics if the
> wrong process unlocks a vnode.  This causes trouble for the odd cases like
> shutdown where a process other than curproc is given to the filesystem
> since vnode_pager_uncache needs to manipulate the vnode lock sometimes.
> 
> I can hack around it by ignoring the passed proc and substituting curproc
> in the places which matter but the right thing to do is for
> vnode_pager_uncache to use the correct proc.
> 
Sounds okay.  Continue in that direction, and later on after work, I'll
review it more carefully.  (in a hurry to go to work :-)).

John