From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jun 27 18:12:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA29568 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 18:12:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kjsl.com (Limpia.KJSL.COM [198.137.202.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA29538 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 18:12:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: (from javier@localhost) by kjsl.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA08789; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 18:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 18:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806280112.SAA08789@kjsl.com> From: Javier Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Colocation facility in SFbay In-Reply-To: <199806262053.NAA21019@proxy4.ba.best.com> References: <199806262053.NAA21019@proxy4.ba.best.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.33 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kurt D. Zeilenga writes: > Folks, > > I'm looking at colocation facilities in the SF Bay Area (SF to SJ). > > My basic needs: > Affordable > low charge per server/space/environment > reasonable bandwidth charges > reliable, well connected provider > Growth ability > could mushroom (I hope :-) > > Initially, I am talking about only 2 servers initially, with additional 2 > within 3 months. Might fit into one rack. Looking at starting > at lowest bandwidth rung and climbing up as needed. The > low per server charge is important as we're planning on using > many small servers (instead of a few huge beasts). > > Looking for recommendations, suggestions, horror stories, etc.? Check out http://www.above.net/. We get our connectivity through them. Excellent reliability and peering. -jav To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message