From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 22 07:38:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA13077 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 07:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA13066 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 07:38:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA07590; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 07:38:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Derek Flowers cc: Wes Peters - Softweyr LLC , Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software support , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Binary package updates, etc. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Mar 1998 03:39:19 EST." Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 07:38:40 -0800 Message-ID: <7587.890581120@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Basically, I just took the binary distribution off the 2.2.5-RELEASE cd > and created a skeleton to get it to work with pkg_add. In theory, any > binary updates would work with the same skeleton. Hmmmm. How does this handle the issue of a /tmp directory that's not big enough to hold the intermediate unpacked copy? That reason is why bin, doc, manpages, etc are not currently distributed as packages. You might look into ``@option extract-in-place'' as a way of getting around that limitation. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message