From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 3 11:57:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ns.cvzoom.net (ns.cvzoom.net [208.226.154.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 510BC37BB7B for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:57:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 7873 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2000 18:57:00 -0000 Received: from acs-63-90-88-170.zbzoom.net (HELO cvzoom.net) (63.90.88.170) by ns.cvzoom.net with SMTP; 3 Apr 2000 18:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <38E8E960.2C5A8FD5@cvzoom.net> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:56:32 -0400 From: Donn Miller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Knowles Cc: Barry Pederson , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Load average calculation? References: <200004030410.XAA75906@celery.dragondata.com> <38E8DEEF.7224C9A@geocities.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brad Knowles wrote: > If there has been an actual change in how the load average is > calculated, then any program that changes it's behaviour based on the > load average may have problems. This would certainly include SMTP > MTAs such as sendmail, Exim, etc.... I agree. IMO, the load avg. formula should stick as close as possible to those in previous releases of FreeBSD. OTOH, maybe those apps that need to query the load avg. are flawed anyways, as load avg. calculation tends to be system dependent. For example, FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris, SCO, etc. may all be running the exact same processes, but will the load avg. always be consistent across those platforms? I think not. - Donn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message