From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 30 10:21:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA25499 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:21:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA25481 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA18574; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 13:21:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 13:21:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: spork cc: Leo Papandreou , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Too much spam from uu.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 30 Jun 1998, spork wrote: > How hard is it to allow uu.net mail relays, but no direct connections > from dialups, ie: foo.tnt.foo.uu.net is blocked but smtp.uu.net is not? > I'm looking to do something like this here, but haven't revisited > sendmail in some time. There's no reason for a dialup connection to > send me (or anyone else) mail directly. They should be sending via > their ISP's relay instead. Sendmail 8.9 has regex matching rules now IIRC. Should not be difficult at all. Not sure how much good it would do you. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message