Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:19:48 +0000 From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r340629 - head/graphics/4va Message-ID: <92695689.5r8znDAH1M@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140122113347.GA53512@FreeBSD.org> References: <201401211817.s0LIHV3U090712@svn.freebsd.org> <20140122113347.GA53512@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:33:47 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 06:17:31PM +0000, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> > - ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/4va.man ${PREFIX}/man/man1/4va.1
> > + ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/4va.man ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/man/man1/4va.1
>
> I risk to become annoying, but manpages should go under MAN[x]PREFIX, not
> PREFIX, where x is optional section number. E.g., in this case, it should
> have been ${MANPREFIX} or ${MAN1PREFIX}.
Considering manpages are now listed in pkg-plist, they must be installed
into PREFIX.
> FWIW, I've personally always preferred unsectioned MANPREFIX, as it seems
> silly to put different sections in different places (at least in FreeBSD;
> perhaps it makes sense in other unices). Do we really need these numbered
> manprefixes, anyone? :)
...and, let me add, MANPREFIX :)
Cheers,
Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92695689.5r8znDAH1M>