Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 21:38:55 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It's time for 5.1-R bits Message-ID: <3EE4014F.1020508@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20030609123312U.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <20030609023437.GA25227@muse.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20030609023437.GA25227@muse.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <3EE3FD39.3020308@freebsd.org> <20030609123312U.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Makoto Matsushita wrote: > scottl> I'm ll in favor of unifying the names. There is concern that > scottl> changing the names on the directories will cause the directory > scottl> contents to be re-rsynced, however. Can some other mirror > scottl> operators comment on this? With less than 11 hours before we > scottl> announce, I hate to upset things. > > Here's my proposals: > > * Apply temporary fix: 'symlink from ISO-IMAGES/5.1-RELEASE to > ISO-IMAGES/5.1' immediately. > * Some weeks later (4 or 6 weeks would be better), remove the symlink > bandaid then rename the directory. > * Have a meeting between release engineering teams, understands that > we have a unified rules for directory names, but we did the mistakes > again (remember 5.0-RELEASE). > > -- - > Makoto `MAR' Matsushita > Sounds like excellent advice. I'll remember to write it down as a TODO this time =-) Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EE4014F.1020508>