From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 3 9:37:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from skyul.myip.org (unknown [211.109.218.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4E137B401 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: (from skyul@localhost) by skyul.myip.org (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f142aqY97024; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 02:36:52 GMT (envelope-from skyul) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 02:36:51 +0000 From: Kwangyul SEO To: Chris Byrnes Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: tcsh.static vs. tcsh Message-ID: <20010204023651.A97012@shell.postech.ac.kr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from chris@JEAH.net on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:11:41AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Binary compiled in static doesn't require any library, so when you have any problem in your libraries, you still can use your static tcsh and work. On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Chris Byrnes wrote: > /sbin/tcsh.static is the root shell on my machine.. Whats the difference > between that and regular tcsh? > > > Chris Byrnes > JEAH Communications > (Direct) 608-256-6167 > (Toll-Free) 866-299-5324 > http://www.JEAH.net > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > -- Thanks icq UIN 104946812, Kwangyul Seo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message