Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 20:25:38 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: rodrigc@crodrigues.org, Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>, ozawa@ongs.co.jp, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-17 release, lock mechanism changed for robust working Message-ID: <20061203012538.GA6274@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4572242F.8000004@samsco.org> References: <4570305A.4010908@freebsd.org> <20061202222423.GA3766@xor.obsecurity.org> <4572242F.8000004@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 06:11:11PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:38:34PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: > >>Hi Guys! > >> > >>It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of > >>the unionfs patchset-17. p17 have some significant improvements > >>around the lock mechanism for robust and stable working. > > > >I got the following locking assertion as soon as I tried to start a > >package build in the unionfs -b mountpoint. > > >=20 > Was this with the full p17 patchset applied, or just the partial set > that was committed to CVS (which is about to be yanked if it doesn't > get fixed)? The full set. Kris --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFcieRWry0BWjoQKURAh+gAKDQf84zRb3LYemqYPYRL3B7EQ5zFgCeJGfR t8VSSjeSR71ElLR+q/oExsc= =PEkN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061203012538.GA6274>