From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 15:40:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4009A16A41F for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED6F43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2HFeKCj074980 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2HFeKbO074979; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:20 GMT Message-Id: <200603171540.k2HFeKbO074979@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Vasil Dimov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/94543: request for removal of security/nessus-*-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vasil Dimov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/94543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vasil Dimov To: Udo Schweigert Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/94543: request for removal of security/nessus-*-devel Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:33:42 +0200 On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:20:36AM +0100, Udo Schweigert wrote: > > As the maintainer of the security/nessus-*-devel ports I would like to remove > them from the tree as "Tenable Network Security" the company behind nessus > has changed their policy. The new nessus-3.x is only delivered as binary and > a development version of nessus is no longer available in sources. > > The affected ports to be removed are: > > security/nessus-libraries-devel > security/nessus-libnasl-devel > security/nessus-devel > security/nessus-plugins-devel > Does marking those ports as DEPRECATED=Development version of nessus is no longer available in sources EXPIRATION_DATE=2006-04-17 look reasonable to you? -- Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra