Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:20:27 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Coalescing pipe allocation Message-ID: <xzpfzds5bc4.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040203121006.79056G-100000@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:12:02 -0500 (EST)") References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040203121006.79056G-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > However, it was side-by-side benchmarking of the resources required > to allocate pipes vs. sockets that caused me to investigate > optimizing the allocation process, as it still costs a lot more to > allocate a pipe than a socket pair. Don't worry about the overhead of allocating the pipe buffer. It will mostly go away when I fix vm_map_find(). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpfzds5bc4.fsf>