From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 23 10:33:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBC5106568F; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ermal.luci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199638FC12; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so726266wwb.13 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:33:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=bCe3hLnxPrlI311b2t9toxT5/MhFKAQpwOIey/0KnV8=; b=sFpmnEGehxudXawiFUZ3Jp2FPJ6++TLiR9CugKkgre0WqbKGmYLh8StIl6y0GepwbI XwRqatVk8isYe/sgsi9Bjit1HkNmlEoK57N4D9X5yYYggDSwa//DIk8/uWaQ42aICb8/ x4ZhLIlZN0lKxgOWAn/eskRnH1y3RQWt2ds3Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=qO8YSMfk+psTv5+mGM9BeJlpevVCTuRZDiOpuLtjcVTyRWxHGTOaxgv0aBECbX6eKI u8jTZirji1EZzq1rV3qHI/S7OW/jU+v/vIkvf5rxByRHsD/rUgFn4vI6/v+irSLth/Jl /zZSzSdOWEuPER7teBXYWGBKkXZD0OMLYt2ug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ermal.luci@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.86.85 with SMTP id v63mr985531wee.32.1266919883143; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:11:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8169EB.4030100@elischer.org> References: <1266739527.25137.519.camel@localhost> <4B80F076.5020109@elischer.org> <20100221084118.W27327@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4B8169EB.4030100@elischer.org> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:11:03 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4f99a8d287dd534a Message-ID: <9a542da31002230211k2fb5d99do7ed574a8cd94f4d9@mail.gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:36:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network simulation using jails & vimage X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:33:45 -0000 On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Julian Elischer wrote= : > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Jim Sifferle wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've used ipfw and Dummynet as well as ipfw + DSCP recognition patch a= nd >>>> pf/altq to simulate Internet and MPLS WAN environments for several >>>> years. All of my setups have run under VMWare, which for many reasons >>>> isn't ideal. I would like to collapse all of these VMs into one FreeB= SD >>>> box using jails and vimages. >>>> >>>> Does any FreeBSD branch / vimage release combination support separate = pf >>>> AND ipfw configurations per jail? I need ipfw+pf/altq for HFSC queuin= g >>>> to simulate the queueing effects of MPLS provider edge and core >>>> routers. >>>> >>> >>> -current (9) should be close, with patches for pf supplied by ceri. >>> >> >> s,ceri,eri, (Ermal Lu=E7i) >> > > err yeah.. > > it'd be nice if itcould get committed > > Ermal, is it ready? > > It is usable look at http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/eri/pf45/head/. For vnet pfsync/pflow/pflog needs some fixes still. > > >> >> 8 can do separate ipfw but pf is not changed. >>> 9 has bugs fixed. but I'm not sure if the changes for pf went in.. >>> they do exis tif they are not in already. >>> >> >> No, pf hasn't gone in yet; it lives in user/eri/pf45/ in svn and I am >> not sure what the plans are. >> >> Apart from the latest changes 8 and 9 should be pretty much in sync >> wrt to VIMAGE I think. >> >> >> I'm hoping the latest 7.2-STABLE-201001 snapshot will work. The DSCP >>>> recognition patch for ipfw that I rely on doesn't seem to work with >>>> 8.0. If 7.2 won't work for my needs, but 8 or 9-CURRENT will, is anyon= e >>>> aware >>>> of an updated ipfw DSCP patch? I haven't seen anything on Google or t= he >>>> freebsd-ipfw mailing list. >>>> >>> >>> what is DSCP? >>> >> >> I guess Differentiated Services CodePoint (if talking MPLS). >> >> >> /bz >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Ermal