From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed May 20 15:10:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6C92DC61C; Wed, 20 May 2020 15:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Rx5Z1XX4z4KQy; Wed, 20 May 2020 15:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from beaver (unknown [81.6.39.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ehaupt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4579A36EA9; Wed, 20 May 2020 15:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:10:39 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Emanuel Haupt , Hiroki Tagato , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, koobs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r535526 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/py-rdiff-backup sysutils/py-rdiff-backup/files sysutils/rdiff-backup Message-Id: <20200520171039.680fd46e6d1180796c50042d@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20200520150415.yn3cc6ebghlf6bpt@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <202005170835.04H8ZKws029186@repo.freebsd.org> <20200520143655.rvvwajvklbkzyvdz@aching.in.mat.cc> <20200520165905.114abeca25f06c90b71f3945@FreeBSD.org> <20200520150415.yn3cc6ebghlf6bpt@aching.in.mat.cc> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:10:42 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 08:35:20AM +0000, Hiroki Tagato wrote: > > > > - Rename portname to py-rdiff-backup following Python Ports > > > > Policy[1] > > > > > > This feels like a very bad idea, for more than one reason. > > > > This was reviewed in (you subscribed too): > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24816 > > > > > - This renamed the package, so once again, it left users running > > > pkg upgrade with an outdated version. Unless they notice it and > > > figure out what the new name of the port is. > > > - This looks like a end user tool, so, people will want to install > > > rdiff-backup, not pyxy-rdiff-backup. > > > > > > All in all, I think the rename should be backed out. > > > > koobs reasoning made sense to me but I don't mind renaming the port > > again if there is a final consensus. > > I don't know the reasoning, but anything that 1) breaks the normal > upgrade path, and 2) makes it non trivial to figure out the name of > the package, must have a flaw somewhere. The detailed reasoning is in the review, search for "On naming (py- or not)"