From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Dec 9 20:04:28 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA05175 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:04:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail001.mediacity.com (mail001.mediacity.com [206.24.105.68]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA05169 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:04:26 -0800 (PST) From: brian@mediacity.com Received: (qmail-queue invoked from smtpd); 10 Dec 1996 04:04:23 -0000 Received: from home001.mediacity.com (HELO mediacity.com) (206.24.105.66) by mail001.mediacity.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 1996 04:04:23 -0000 Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 100); 10 Dec 1996 04:04:22 -0000 Message-ID: <19961210040422.8595.qmail@mediacity.com> Subject: Re: sendmail vs. qmail To: vlad@dusk.net (Christian Hochhold) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:04:22 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199612092020.QAA02279@eternal.dusk.net> from Christian Hochhold at "Dec 9, 96 04:20:45 pm" Reply-To: brian@mediacity.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Christian Hochhold wrote: > Is anyone here running qmail rather than sendmail? > I have heard that qmail is more secure, and less > of a pain that sendmail, once installed and running. > > Any comments as to which one is better and > why? I run qmail on 10 systems without any troubles. Everything you have heard it true. -- Brian Litzinger Powered by FreeBSD http[s]://www.mpress.com