Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:13:35 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail got updated! Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK3aGYVexJGS=o=Xk8LzmeRKfEgRdhO%2BB9JBXrqc=%2BTnLQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1712190843030.95772@mx.roble.com> References: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1712190843030.95772@mx.roble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> wrote: > As one of the "irresponsible" people who is still using procmail on our >> systems and has built an number of scripts and customer infrastructure >> around it I take exception to the term irresponsible. Perhaps the better >> word is overworked. If I had the time to move to dovecot/sieve or maildrop >> as a local delivery agent I would have done so by now. >> > > Can certainly sympathize depending on the threat model, but how is that > any different from Equifax' not having time to patch Struts or not > having time to change the oil in your car or to brush your teeth ... > That's a non-sequitur if I understand the response correctly. Procmail IS patched and I assume applied. So yes mom, teeth are brushed. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/mail/procmail/files/patch-src-formisc.c?view=log -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3aGYVexJGS=o=Xk8LzmeRKfEgRdhO%2BB9JBXrqc=%2BTnLQ>