From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 09:34:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BAA16A404 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 923D313C46A for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 May 2007 09:34:01 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 14 May 2007 11:34:01 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+D/qAGPJuD1j5ghs71jLxzlHCGDxXh85N//eHPbJ f4xv9HZKV4Zk87 Message-ID: <46482CF0.7070907@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:33:36 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070506) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com References: <464597C6.3030406@gmx.de> <4647E9C3.9010000@u.washington.edu> <4647F33B.5030008@gmx.de> <001701c79602$2f14ecf0$8d3ec6d0$@Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> In-Reply-To: <001701c79602$2f14ecf0$8d3ec6d0$@Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: 'Garrett Cooper' , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:34:03 -0000 Thomas Sparrevohn wrote: >> If you follow the thread, there's already some success in reducing the >> time >> required to register ports with many dependencies. On my system >> registering >> x11/xorg now takes between 2 to 3 minutes instead of 10, with all the >> changes. >> I consider that a remarkable improvement. > > Absolutely a worthy improvement - by all means lets test it > Search for the archive for the second incarnation of Stephen Montgomery-Smith's patch to pkg_create. Besides not yet being fully functional, my work is far less significant.