From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Dec  7 00:58:24 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA17237
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:58:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.12])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id AAA17229
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:58:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca14-03.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.67]) by dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA09290; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:57:48 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id AAA04372; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612070857.AAA04372@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: erich@lodgenet.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: 9term build failure
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

(Sorry for the triplet of mails....)

I know why it didn't fail before.  I sorted plan9/Makefile as part of
the general cleanup process.  We used to have "sam" in front of
"9term", so it worked if I did a "make" from the upper level.

This is not the correct way to go about dependencies.  I'll fix the
9term port.

Satoshi