From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 11 22:45:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AC9106566B for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borisbsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f191.google.com (mail-yx0-f191.google.com [209.85.210.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8381D8FC14 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe29 with SMTP id 29so1885463yxe.16 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:45:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VF659a/GOGQtikRM50O4pwf00hRtqzUoSDKTfITtlzQ=; b=dloq/KDpRrCDdBjuz0G5C4CITX4YwF63jWK3AsRxZHkMxQX7mhFsPfS9XmeW3j3uxe 9ZPHRg3KeEmOSZdBniZqz6RAHM3LUcO58iudrDj7cASzx07p3ikp6a3X4kZ0dSo/dCwS OGneFnfxoP+9IUj+gSWNc/lImZI269SpvvwX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eiF6xmBg2hM5jaZ8fULwP/T5Lxh9BOT6XJtnIHJbe652OCYo8WMnmxJ8WRA+OLoTkZ mFTPOpdK+PJzgFrWvF8vLSTh99z58WMdyJWZ/szrLXDN+iqRr7/kBW6lz4r+9Tj+5sab u/YCOwDsBjjr2CfgcjoXKjZL38Pau+mz65cAk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.95.3 with SMTP id x3mr3858519anl.112.1252709148314; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:45:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20090611194557.GC98175@bsdcrew.de> <20090906162544.GA39448@bsdcrew.de> <50e4b96fb035ba5eaf5e30fbf12bf9f2.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <367b2c980909071048j79b28babwcc9d59488d1de3ef@mail.gmail.com> <5effc292d4e1b51c1b33e8a1f987ccbc.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <4AA8DAAF.3010507@shapeshifter.se> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:45:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: Boris To: Bernhard Froehlich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:45:50 -0000 Thanks all I got the latest revision (461) from your repository Bernhard an= d Fredrik's feature compiles correctly. I got a Debian64 VM with 4GB running on BETA4 amd64 with bridge interface working well. I just got a problem after installing the VBoxGuestAdditions-amd64. I rebooted, got on login screen (graphical) in the VM, issued user/pass and the VM aborts. As I noticed VBoxGuestAdditions-amd64 require 2.6.27 and I am running 2.6.26-2, I will align. VBoxGuestAdditions-amd64 installed successfully on 2.6.26-2 though. I will let you know if I still get the same behaviour after Linux kernel upgrade in the VM. Anyway I think I will go for proper CLI access now it is reachable through the bridged interface :-) Thanks again for all contributors ! Boris On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Bernhard Froehlich wrot= e: > On Thu, September 10, 2009 12:53 pm, Fredrik Lindberg wrote: > > Bernhard Fr=F6hlich wrote: > >> On Tue, September 8, 2009 12:00 pm, Boris wrote: > >>> Hi Bernhard, > >>> > >>> I confirm VT-x is now working. It used to fail on my system with > >>> previous > >>> release from the time I launched the VM. > >> > >> Good to hear that! Thanks for testing it. > >> > >>> I am using amd64-8-BETA4 and rev 456. > >>> I have experienced a crash of the VM in the middle of the installatio= n > >>> of > >>> a > >>> Debian64 so I will try again and report if it's reproducible. I used = an > >>> existing virtual disk so I'll try again from scratch. > >> > >> I've seen something similar but haven't found out yet where the proble= m > >> is. > >> > >>> Could you confirm if the patch from Fredrik Lindberg is going to be > >>> integrate to a next revision before port freeze? > >>> > >>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-September/00674= 0.html > >> > >> The short answer is no. That patch will not be included in the vbox > >> update. > >> > >> We try to stay as close to the official code as possible and instead > >> send > >> all patches upstream to get them included. So if that patch is stable = it > >> should be send to vbox-dev@ and i'm sure aeichner will be glad to have > a > >> look at it. I will talk to Fredrik if we can help in any way. > >> > >> > > > > The network patches have been included in the upstream VirtualBox sourc= e > > as of revision 22899. > > Yes, we've seen that. Thanks again for your work and for sending it > upstream. Inclusion within one day is really fast :o) > > We plan to update the FreeBSD port today with r22683 which will then be > shipped with 8.0. After that we will update our svn port to the latest > code so people can start testing it. > > -- > Bernhard Fr=F6hlich > http://www.bluelife.at/ > >