From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 13 14:27:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77C616A403 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smw2010@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B959B43D58 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:27:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smw2010@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so397268nzn for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 07:27:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=c5CpDlhhFC5dS9uL9H7lt9VeQisS0PIGBlMHxdH1dzOA4+iMOIPw+5FFHQfEsba27yITEi7F4IHyCK3UZpJKNwsYNbnKC6iqqZ+qSekPSt63KMHZfeZuTREfxCq9yTSbeziO8HLG2HS+sL2YrPVsvDOS/VoYJbeQfsgzARh4UZM= Received: by 10.65.191.7 with SMTP id t7mr5050010qbp; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 07:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.148.18 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 07:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:27:22 +1000 From: "Sam Wun" To: "VANHULLEBUS Yvan" In-Reply-To: <20061013130256.GA10192@zen.inc> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <25685948.1160744185756.JavaMail.root@web03sl> <20061013130256.GA10192@zen.inc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for IPSEC_NAT_T X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:27:26 -0000 in the kernel config file, what if I only define options IPSEC_NAT_T without defining FAST_IPSEC? I m not familiar with FAST_IPSEC, if I compile IPSEC_NAT_T with or without FAST_IPSEC, what s that going to affect my current IPSEC configuration and connection? Thanks S On 10/13/06, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:25PM +1000, fwun@bigpond.net.au wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi. > > > I tried to compile freebsd 6.2 prerelease source with "options > > IPSEC_NAT_T", but it said "unknown option "IPSEC_NAT_T"" when I > > build it > > > > Had IPSEC_NAT_T patch already built into the 6.2 pre source? > > > > If not, where to obtain the patch? > > Patch is available here: http://ipsec-tools.sf.net/freebsd6-natt.diff > and is not (yet ?) in FreeBSD's sources. > > > Yvan. > > -- > NETASQ > http://www.netasq.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >