From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 09:55:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B8F16B591 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9166E43D64 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k519ss66005858; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 03:54:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <447EB9C0.9010402@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:56:16 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Braniss References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI/sendto(...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:55:23 -0000 Danny Braniss wrote: > Hi, > on a fairly new 6.1-stable, and probably before, once in a > blue moon, sendto return error 64 (EHOSTDOWN?). but the packet seems to have > been received by the target, since i get a response, and further more, > everything keeps on working. > > what is error 64? > > danny > > EHOSTDOWN comes from the ARP layer of the IP stack, and would be consistent with the host either getting no arp response or rejected responses from the target. It would be useful to run tcpdump+ethereal on your connection to see what is really going on. Scott