From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 25 03:10:53 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA05740 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 25 Dec 1996 03:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.inetd.ru (internet-design-gw.infopro.spb.su [195.242.0.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id DAA05735 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 1996 03:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (vaggie@localhost) by ns.inetd.ru (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id OAA26444 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 1996 14:10:33 +0300 Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 14:10:33 +0300 (MSK) From: Ilya Oussov Reply-To: npop3@energo.ru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: silo overflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 24 Dec 1996, John D Duncan wrote: > If you have a fast processor, then there is a problem with your config. I have dx4-100 and one serial line locked at 38400 (not so high) with 16550 UART. But the problem with overflows still exist. So what do you mean speaking about config problems? Are there any means to increase serial priority in config or you probably mean just right port's irq/addr? -- o-:^>___? Ilya Oussov `~~c--^c' Internet Design, Ltd.