Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:11:22 +0200
From:      Stefan Wessels Beljaars <stefan@maryjane.nl>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
Message-ID:  <200404222211.22288.stefan@maryjane.nl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
References:  <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 22 April 2004 11:58, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, from 4.7
> to (I thought) 4.9, by CVSuping RELENG_4 and "make buildworld" etc.
>
> Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
>
> Is this release considered stable?  It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD
> page.  Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X instead?
>
if u use RELENG_4_10, cvsup, do a buildworld/installworld by the (hand)book, 
you will get 4.10-RC.

> Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
> in for?
>
> -- Dave
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Stefan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404222211.22288.stefan>