From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 1 13:11:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9FE106566C for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2048FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q71DBZWH003300; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:11:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q71DBZHo003297; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:11:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:11:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: jb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:11:36 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patent hit - MS goes after Linux - FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:11:41 -0000 > this should not be ignored; sooner or later things will get nasty ... > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/25/microsoft_patent_deal_amdocs/ > > The sooner FreeBSD gets rid of Linux-based software (apps, tools) in its ports, > the better. The FB Foundation and Core Team should enact a plan. ports are not software itself. ports are set of tools to build/install someone else software. FreeBSD doesn't force you to install any ports, and core system doesn't consist of linux software at all. It is not the FreeBSD and core team responsibility of what ports you are using. Appropriate licence files are put in ports tree. > This should actually happen regardless of MS in the shadows and validity of > their claims. Why? Core system and ports are two clearly separate things.