From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 16:49:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B8A16A41C for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:49:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B00D43D1D for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:49:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EA47305D; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:49:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07714-06-2; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFB17303E; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.20 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53932.192.168.1.20.1119804556.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <1119804132.831.35.camel@homey.my.domain> References: <1119335564.80965.39.camel@homey.my.domain> <42B81F9B.50608@celeritystorm.com> <28717.145.248.192.30.1119363225.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <1119409452.80965.63.camel@homey.my.domain> <1119804132.831.35.camel@homey.my.domain> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:49:16 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" To: "Bob Perry" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solution: Unable to decipher error "ELF binary type 3 not known" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jpeg@thilelli.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:49:23 -0000 >> I ran portupgrade -f linux_base-8 successfully and then ran portupgrade >> -arR. The system reports stale dependencies and suggest I manually run >> pkgdb -F to fix which I do. The first line of output reads: >> Stale dependency: acroread-5.10_1,1 -> linux-expat-1.95.5_2 >> (textproc/linux-expat): >> linux-fontconfig-2.1_2 (score:31%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) >> >> If I understand Michael Lucas' "Cleaning Up Ports", acroread has >> recorded linux-expat-1.95.5_2 as a dependency but linux-fontconfig-2.1_2 >> is installed and it's asking if I want to have the entry in /var/db/pkg >> point to linux-fontconfig-2.1_2 as the correct dependency. And the >> answer is, "Damned if I know." > As previously mentioned, I resolved the original error: > ELF binary type "3" not known > by reinstalling linux_base-8 as recommended. Not sure about this issue > but I will research further. Thanks again. > > The stale dependency issue was another story. I discovered, through > comparing the dependency output from pkg_info -rR against the actual > list of dependency data that some of the dependent files were missing. > (I'm sure I must have deleted them inadvertently). Once they were > identified and reinstalled everything was as it should have been. > I don't know if this is a bug in the program or just me. At least now I > know my next steps when I see a stale dependency prompt requesting me to > choose between two apparently non-related packages. I think in this particular case, a forced upgrade/reinstall of the targeted port and its dependancies must be all what you wanted: # portupgrade -rRf acroread5 /* Or what the _name_ of the package is */ -- -jpeg.