Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:22:49 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 210608] www/subsonic-standalone: Update to 6.0 and improve port
Message-ID:  <bug-210608-13-gCNLmEd44f@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-210608-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-210608-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210608

--- Comment #17 from Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@FreeBSD.org> ---
I started with an empty scratch jail and the port and its dependencies are
still being compiled :-).

Anyways, from the detailed summary you gave (thanks!), here are my comments:

- I would rather leave "-standalone" in ${PORTNAME}; otherwise I think this
port will be identified as "subsonic", like the non-standalone version and =
this
may cause unforeseen problems (like, for instance, I don't know how the upg=
rade
process will handle this).  I can be convinced to use ${PKGNAMESUFFIX}, but
please give a good reason.

- I'm not super fan of installing the port to ${DATADIR}.  I find it weird =
to
have the .sh there.  This is the main reason I ended up installing in
${PREFIX}/${PORTDIRNAME}.  But well, I guess it's OK.  Nonetheless I am
concerned about the upgrade path; have you tested this?

- Please make either a compat shim for the options you removed, or a big
warning the option has been deprecated, giving the replacement method.

-- Jeremie

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210608-13-gCNLmEd44f>