From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 12:51:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD941065672 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [220.233.188.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5968E8FC16 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:51:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mB1Cpexl070958; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:51:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:51:40 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Brett Davidson In-Reply-To: <20081201120023.9E1821065688@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20081201233222.L34249@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20081201120023.9E1821065688@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there anything weird I should know about using ipfw on alias addresses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:51:42 -0000 On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:52:12 +1300 Brett Davidson wrote: > ifconfig shows the alias addresses correctly bound. > Creating an ipfw rule and testing it from the command line works > (connects out from master address, not alias) > > From website on alias address, the firewall blocks the packets. > > The weird thing is that it tags them (in the security log) as coming > from the master address (not the alias) out the correct interface. In a > normal world that would mean the packet would match!!!!! > > What's goin' on here Willis? Difficult to tell without seeing a) ifconfig b) netstat -rn c) at least the relevant firewall rule/s and d) log entries that illustrate your problem. Obscure sensitive information by all means, but otherwise pretend we haven't the slightest clue how your system is configured :) cheers, Ian