From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 9 05:37:32 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id FAA09462 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 05:37:32 -0800 Received: from picspc01.pics.com (picspc01.pics.com [192.135.189.20]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA09456 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 05:37:29 -0800 Received: (from tpr@localhost) by picspc01.pics.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id IAA09526 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 08:37:34 -0500 From: Terry Rossi Message-Id: <199502091337.IAA09526@picspc01.pics.com> Subject: Is options "GATEWAY" needed 4 ppp To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 08:37:32 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1389 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have a remote dial in user calling into my FreeBSD 2.0R machine. I cannot seem to route his traffic on the FreeBSD box. Do I need the options "GATEWAY" in the kernel? If someone can help I would appreciate it. I have done the following. arp -s perm pub and the output of netstat -r looks like this. picspc02 is the remote ppp user picspc01 is the FreeBSD server Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface default picsrt01 UGS 7 217834 ed0 localhost localhost UH 0 24 lo0 your-net link#1 UC 0 0 ed0 picsdg01 8:0:1b:18:ff:ff UHL 1 98 ed0 picspc01 0:0:e8:c2:20:e3 UHL 1 4035 lo0 picsrt01 0:0:c:9:f0:b3 UHL 1 0 ed0 picspc02 picspc01 UH 0 0 ppp0 picspc02 0:0:e8:c2:20:e3 UHLS2 0 0 ed0 picsfs02 0:0:c0:67:1f:70 UHL 0 358 ed0 192.135.189.255 link#1 UHL 1 244 ed0 -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Terry Rossi tpr@pics.com Data: 609/753-2540 Sysop, Pics OnLine BBS telnet: bbs.pics.com 609/767-0216 Voice/Fax WWW: http://www.pics.com